В Днепропетровске появился ”Черный Справочник ” города.

В Днепропетровске появился ”Черный Справочник ” города.

Стоп Хабар Днепропетровск черный справочникНа антикоррупционном интернет-портале http://stophabar.com.ua создан так называемый «Черный справочник Днепропетровска». Это единый реестр  подпольных казино, борделей, мест продажи наркотических средств и других видов незаконной деятельности в городе Днепропетровске.

Каждый житель города может сообщить о местонахождении нелегального бизнеса, после чего будет выполнена проверка подлинности информации и в случае подтверждения последует немедленное закрытие данных незаконных мест – сообщают в общественной организации “Стоп Хабар Днепропетровск”

Организаторы незаконной деятельности увеличивают криминогенную обстановку  в городе и  нарушают уголовный кодекс Украины, поэтому должны нести ответственность за свои действия. Закон превыше всего! – убежден председатель общественной организации “Стоп Хабар Днепропетровск” Эдуард Якушкин.

Как отмечают в организации  —  наиболее опасны для горожан такие незаконные заведения, которые находятся непосредственно в жилых домах, так как  ,,проигравшийся,,  или ,,недоуколовшийся,, может захотеть легких денег. А это влечет за собой обворовывание автомобилей, нападение на  жильцов дома и тд.

Поделиться в соцсетях:

GoogleRSS

Один комментарий к В Днепропетровске появился ”Черный Справочник ” города.

  1. www.name-cards.net 27.08.2017 at 12:35

    Edit: I’m sure this will get downvoted not in light of its factual or logical premise, but because unfortunately, reddit is filled with users who vote based on popular opinion, not on the merits of the actual So be it though, rather align myself with truthful education than the ignorant masses that flood this You are ignorant in your position, and its not really your Your thinking is aligned with a dying paradigm, and its actually what Einstine predicted used inductive logic and philosophical thinking to help discover theoric of How is philosophy useful for science? Because in itself, there are some issues that have overlying philosphical and scientific elements to For example, why does an organic compound have any reason to retain itself within the presence of an orgaism beyond the laws of natural science? We see organisms strive for survival and reproduction everyday, but why should organic elements and their atoms care about what form they take outside of natural chemistry? Why is there apparently a "will" for these elements and compounds to survive in states not always stable to prolong the life of an organism? Yet, it is observable, and unexplainable thus far by scientific This is a fundamental philosophical question about our physical and metaphysical reality that can lead the direction of future scientific A lot of philosophical overlap exists with Theoretical Physics and Philosophy too: "What does a solution look like for this theory?" "What counts as an aswer for this problem?" No matter what you do, you’re going to have philosphical overlap in any body of knowledge within the human observation because it helps us define and set the rules as what we have to conform that information Nobody is saying that a Philosopher sits in a lab, does your work, compiles the information, and then tells you what the science is and Thats a gross misunderstanding that is your own How we find this information useful, why, and how we setup what counts as an answer, or the systems to get that answer, that will always be And believe me, you’re only going to bump into more philosphical overlap as our theorical physics develop, especially if we ever get more information about black The only reason scientists of today, which sadly operate like philistines, tote their disdain for philosophy so openly, is because of their ignorance, arrogance, and misunderstanding on the They believe their body of knowledge is somehow more superior or important than human knowledge in general, even when it comes to the very foundation and guide lines that their science rests upon in the first By the way, correcting your collegue on a position he is logically incorrect about is not defending the value of your information, its educating your collegue with valuable information he should know

    Ответить

Добавить комментарий

Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *